The Patient Centered Approach to Treating Patients Suffering with Schizophrenia and other Serious Mental Illnesses

Background -the patient is weak or non-existent, the best we can
One aspect of the mental health Access andhope for is blind compliance and not engagement.
Retention Initiative involves using transaction data toWhile transitioning to a true person centered
identify non-engaged patients. These patients may beapproach takes a significant commitment of time,
defined as those having diagnoses includingtraining and process support, what follows are some
schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bi-polarkey questions that can be asked about current
disorder and who, during the pre-pilot period missedpractice that can help focus some immediate
30% or more of their scheduled individual therapytransition efforts.
appointments and/ or medication management1. Does the current clinical assessment identify
follow-up appointments. Once these patients aremeaningful patient strengths, preferences and
identified, their provider staff will be identified and willpersonal goals, and do the patient and all staff
pilot one or more strategies intended to improvecurrently working with the patient know what these
patient engagement.are?
The purpose of this article is to outline some2. Does the assessment conclude with identified
potential 'engagement improvement' strategies as aneeds that are meaningful to the patient's personal
basis for pilot staff "self assessment" (i.e. where dogoals and reasons for seeking treatment, and do
individual pilot staff stand with regard to current usethey make sense to the patient.
of the strategies), "strategy selection" (i.e. which3. Can the patient, without significant prompting,
strategies do the pilot staff believe might improvearticulate the current goal(s) and objectives in his/her
retention among their identified pilot cases) andservice plan?
"identification of training/ support" for strategy4. Is there one integrated service plan, with relatively
implementation. Since the no-show / cancellation ratesfew current goals and objectives? (multiple plans and
for the selected 'non-engaged' pilot patients will havenumerous goals/objectives are confusing to the
occurred in the context of current practice, sitepatient and staff)
teams are encouraged to pilot strategies not5. Can all staff that work with the patient know and
currently in use or not consistently in use.articulate the current goal(s), objectives, and relevant
Person Centered Approach Engagement Strategy -patient strengths in the service plan (at least those
Of the strategies routinely discussed for improvingthat pertain to the intervention they are providing --
the attendance of mental health patients (includingincluding group interventions)?
those suffering with schizophrenia, schizoaffective6. Do the patient's current service plan goals reflect
disorder or bi-polar disorder), the person centered(sound like) things the patient wants as opposed to
approach is probably the one most likely to generatethings others (e.g. the provider) want for the patient?
a lasting change in patient level of engagement.7. Are the current objectives in the service plan
However, it also involves the broadest and mostmeaningful, measurable changes in the patient's skills,
significant change in practice for providers who dofunctional capabilities, symptoms, etc that clearly
not currently embrace and use the approach. Also,relate to ultimate achievement of a goal of
since a meaningful person centered approach beginsimportance to a patient?
with the assessment and service plan, it is difficult to8. Does the patient believe the objectives in the
implement 'mid stream' for patients already in serviceservice plan are achievable in a reasonable amount of
for some time, unless there is willingness to revisittime?
the assessment and plan.9. Where possible are the objectives stated in
While many provider organizations claim to embrace apositive (hopeful) language as opposed to using the
person centered approach, a review of actual case"dead man standard" (i.e. if a person died he/she
records often does not support this. Many providerswould accomplish the objectives)?
confuse Person Centeredness with "treating the10. Does the service plan mention specifically what
patient respectfully" or "listing patient strengths" inpatient strengths can be employed to help achieve a
the assessment. To gain a good understanding of thegoal and associated objective(s)?
"Person Centered Approach" to actual practice, you11. Does the service plan articulate the interventions
are referred to the book, "Treatment Planning for(not just services) that are planned to help the
Person -- Centered Care" by Doctors Neal Adamspatient achieve the objectives?
and Diane M. Grieder.12. Do the patient and staff clearly understand how
In a nutshell, the Person Centered Approach isthe interventions and services planned will help
ultimately about producing better outcomes and notachieve the objectives?
about "being respectful" which is something thatProviders are generally familiar with the "Golden
should be a 'given' in any orientation to service.Thread" concept as it relates to documentation
Particularly germane to the topic of 'engagement' islinkage and medical necessity. Person Centeredness,
the impact of person centered care on patientinvolved making that Golden Thread obvious and
motivation. Ultimately, if the mental health treatmentmeaningful in the everyday patient-provider
plan and the services provided offer little of inherentrelationship. While the above questions by no means
value to the patient, why would we expectreflect the entire person centered process, they can
engagement? If, in a patient's experience, thebe objectively applied to help assess the current level
connection between what goes on in treatment orof person centered practice.
rehabilitative sessions and something of real value to